Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Backend
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Deploy
Releases
Container Registry
Analyze
Contributor analytics
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Arkindex
Backend
Commits
159d5cd3
Commit
159d5cd3
authored
4 years ago
by
Bastien Abadie
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Plain Diff
Merge branch 'bug-user-upgrade-privilege' into 'master'
Prevent a member to update its own membership freely Closes
#628
See merge request
!1189
parents
84b496a5
06e54d47
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
1 merge request
!1189
Prevent a member to update its own membership freely
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
arkindex/users/api.py
+10
-8
10 additions, 8 deletions
arkindex/users/api.py
arkindex/users/tests/test_generic_memberships.py
+21
-1
21 additions, 1 deletion
arkindex/users/tests/test_generic_memberships.py
with
31 additions
and
9 deletions
arkindex/users/api.py
+
10
−
8
View file @
159d5cd3
...
...
@@ -620,17 +620,19 @@ class MembershipDetails(RetrieveUpdateDestroyAPIView):
# Check the access level of the request user on the content object
access_level
=
get_max_level
(
self
.
request
.
user
,
membership
.
content_object
)
if
not
access_level
or
access_level
<
Role
.
Guest
.
value
:
# The request user does not have a read acces
raise
NotFound
if
(
self
.
request
.
method
not
in
SAFE_METHODS
# Allow an user to remove its own membership
and
membership
.
user_id
!=
self
.
request
.
user
.
id
and
access_level
<
Role
.
Admin
.
value
):
# Allow any guest to retrieve informations
if
self
.
request
.
method
in
SAFE_METHODS
:
return
# Allow a user to remove its own membership
if
self
.
request
.
method
==
'
DELETE
'
and
membership
.
user_id
==
self
.
request
.
user
.
id
:
return
# Only allow admins to edit the access level of a membership
if
access_level
<
Role
.
Admin
.
value
:
raise
PermissionDenied
(
detail
=
'
Only admins of the target membership group can perform this action.
'
)
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
arkindex/users/tests/test_generic_memberships.py
+
21
−
1
View file @
159d5cd3
...
...
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ class TestMembership(FixtureAPITestCase):
cls
.
admin
=
User
.
objects
.
create_user
(
'
admin@address.com
'
,
'
P4$5w0Rd
'
)
cls
.
non_admin
=
User
.
objects
.
filter
(
rights__group_target
=
cls
.
group
,
rights__level
__lt
=
Role
.
Admin
.
value
rights__level
=
Role
.
Contributor
.
value
).
first
()
cls
.
non_admin
.
verified_email
=
True
cls
.
non_admin
.
save
()
...
...
@@ -818,6 +818,26 @@ class TestMembership(FixtureAPITestCase):
'
level
'
:
11
})
def
test_edit_privilege_escalation
(
self
):
"""
A user cannot update its own access level if he has no admin access
"""
second_admin
=
User
.
objects
.
create
(
email
=
'
another_user@test.fr
'
,
verified_email
=
True
)
self
.
group
.
memberships
.
create
(
user
=
second_admin
,
level
=
Role
.
Admin
.
value
)
cases
=
[
(
self
.
non_admin
,
Role
.
Guest
.
value
,
status
.
HTTP_403_FORBIDDEN
),
(
self
.
non_admin
,
Role
.
Admin
.
value
,
status
.
HTTP_403_FORBIDDEN
),
(
second_admin
,
Role
.
Guest
.
value
,
status
.
HTTP_200_OK
),
]
for
user
,
level
,
response_status
in
cases
:
self
.
client
.
force_login
(
user
)
membership
=
self
.
group
.
memberships
.
get
(
user
=
user
)
response
=
self
.
client
.
put
(
reverse
(
'
api:membership-details
'
,
kwargs
=
{
'
pk
'
:
str
(
membership
.
id
)}),
{
'
level
'
:
level
}
)
self
.
assertEqual
(
response
.
status_code
,
response_status
)
def
test_edit_membership_superadmin
(
self
):
"""
Superadmins are allowed to update any membership level
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment